This Tooth is called Being or in the Hyperqabalah it is the node ‘Triebnegesin’. It is the feeder node for the yestertooth of Eskatology (Daagolenyfo).

Lovecraftian is an adjective for a whole family of phenomena. Some earlier than Lovecraft himself. One example of this being Chambers’ famous ‘The King in Yellow.’ One way in which we an look upon this set of weirdness is its ability to disengage from the conventional take on monsters (fairyland creatures, dragon like creatures and devils/demons, the undead). These forms may be revisited but they are reappropriated under new guises. It is a phenomenon that many of us may have experienced to see some fantastic world or city in a dream and feel that this has some reality to more than a mere dream. Whilst this may or may not be true, our inability to frequently visit such places at will means they still fall under the category of dream, no matter how luminous and interesting they may have seemed.

What Chambers’ Lovecraft, Machen etc did was to facilitate the perception of these worlds as real, persisting dimensions that push up against our own. The inhabitants of which look, from the human perception, like something extremely sinister (though by their own standards they may well not be so).

Of course we cannot answer any question regarding the reality of such worlds. Hypersitition can solidify such inventions and project them back into history. What we rummage here for a is a comment on a sort of sideways movement that either accesses them or creates them.

This somehow all ties to the pluralistic spirituality talked about elsewhere. The systems all have some kind of interaction with a pre-intellectual awarenesss. Access to this awareness is a wellspring from which a certain different kind of intelligence persists. Buddhism clearly acknowledges the existence of the spirits as things one may meet on the way, however they are their powers are said to be distractions to the true way.

This again is not the discussion here (the trueness of one way). The point is fading from me as I write. The word rivulets returns to me, every time I go through the process. There are flows in the pneuma, great accretive structures either real of archetypal that move laterally to a vertical axis towards and away from ‘enlightenment’, which itself is just one possibility.

In the lateral flows are created or exist strange worlds which may feed back into our own (hyperstition). The experience of a book like the ‘King in Yellow’ is one that I feel some empathy with. Like, many I have seen a book not dissimilar to this in dreams -though I would not consider it sinister, but rather very strange. This book is related to the Hyperqabalah. There is no claim of universal importance here, only an observation of the way in which the other world interacts with this one through strange feedback loops.

This Tooth is called Superman/Boudica. It is weird that it has this double title. No doubt this is partially to do with its relation to the Chariot of the Tarot (which features the notion of chariot and hero). It is also remarkable, as was commented before, that in the Hyperqabalah (Eildour), it is the feeder node of the Teufos which is fetus. Hence Superman and Boudica produce the child. However the child as Hyperqabalah node has the curious name Teufos, reminiscent of Teufel (German for the Devil) and also Te UFOs , which could be an adaptation of the Te Deum. It’s tree is the holly, its animal the hare.

How can we make sense of Sunyata? What has happened to the relation to the accretions? Such a person is said to live through a primordial intelligence, seeing things as they are. We can translate this into seeing the vector field itself, but this only makes a certain level of sense. This is because to experience the vector field is to see the regions with no concepts. This is what Sunyata does, however the event of Sunyata also has a being that can still function, they can still use the concepts. 

What are we to make of this? In the ordinary situation the concepts plug into the vectors connecting self-accretion and external vector via accretions (of pneuma) attached to the vector. Clearly the Sunyata person-site is still functioning with the same array of concepts but also has at their disposal other ones that are invisible to regular NARPs ( Neurotic Accretion, Regional Processor) to use the old CEO terminology).

Since we speculate pneuma as a kind of substance, possibly a much simpler process of conceptual naming and recognition is employed in relation to the vector field. The pneuminous accretion is there but reduced to practically nothing; something we don’t consider possible with the heavy accretive layers we commonly attach to things. This gossamer level of minimal attachment is all that is required to enable the same level of communication whilst also revealing the vector field (a sort of things nakedly as they are to humans) itself. The description is of greater richness of perception. One can easily see how the conceptual (accretive) removal could achieve this. The questions remain about more a priori concepts (Kantian categories) and how much Sunyata also can remove these.